DPO-Aligned vs. SFT-Only Models on HateXplain for Low-Resource Language Varieties

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the performance of DPO-aligned models on low-resource language varieties (e.g., Spanish vs. Galician) compare to SFT-only models when evaluated on the HateXplain benchmark, measured by. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 6.3/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

How does the performance of DPO-aligned models on low-resource language varieties (e.g., Spanish vs. Galician) compare to SFT-only models when evaluated on the HateXplain benchmark, measured by F1-score across dialects?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance