Index |  Research ▾  |  Verification ▾  | About
SRCH:FABEC1B6

Impact of Latent Dimensionality Scaling on Perceptual Quality in MIDI-to-Audio Synthesis

Submitted: 12 June 2026
Review score: 8.50/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Gate status: Verified
Quality tier: Flagship candidate
Verified claims: 16
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20671026

Abstract

Abstract: Speech synthesis and music audio generation from symbolic input differ in many aspects but share some similarities. In this study, we investigate how text-to-speech synthesis techniques can be used for piano MIDI-to-audio synthesis tasks. Our investigation includes Tacotron and neural source-filter waveform models as the basic components, with which we build MIDI-to-audio synthesis systems in similar ways to TTS frameworks. We also include reference systems using conventional sound modeling techniques such as sample-based and physical-modeling-based methods. The subjective experimental results

Research Question

What is the impact of scaling the latent dimensionality in Tacotron-like models on the perceptual quality (measured via MUSHRA scores) of MIDI-to-audio synthesis for polyphonic instruments?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims16
Claim record sourceparsed source sections

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Truth-Engine Gate Verdict

StatusVerified
GateGate 2 — Verification (formal proof or sandbox reproduction)
ReasonSealed-sandbox formula repro: Computed 10.0083 matches expected 10.0083 (tolerance=5.0%).
Evaluated2026-06-12T20:22:19.240532+00:00

This record has passed Gate 2: a Lean4 proof source type-checks, or a sealed-sandbox run reproduced the reported results within the stated tolerance. A reproducible artifact (proof source or repro script and results) is attached to this record. VERIFIED requires an attached reproducible artifact (Lean4 proof source, or repro script and results) before this status can be set; it is not derived from review score or claim count.

Quality Tier

TierFlagship candidate
BasisReview score, verified-claim count, and public artifact coverage meet flagship-candidate thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage16 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.