Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:BE717D00

Model Size Effects on Self-Repair Efficiency in Llama-2 Code Generation

Submitted: 3 June 2026
Review score: 6.83/10
Verification: L1, Literature synthesis
Quality tier: Watchlist

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: To what extent does model size (e.g., 7B vs. 13B vs. 70B) impact the efficiency of self-repair in Llama-2 models, evaluated by the trade-off between pass@1 accuracy and inference latency in code. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 6.8/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

To what extent does model size (e.g., 7B vs. 13B vs. 70B) impact the efficiency of self-repair in Llama-2 models, evaluated by the trade-off between pass@1 accuracy and inference latency in code generation tasks?

Verification Level

Paper levelL1, Literature synthesis
Source-grounded claims0
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierWatchlist
BasisReview score or public verified-claim signal is below DOI-grade threshold.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength LOW
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status MEDIUM

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL2, Public artifact record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordNot registered
Claim lineage0 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.