Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:A94078E4

What is the robustness degradation of 7B and 70B LLMs on HotPotQA when context window is extended from 32K to

Submitted: 28 May 2026
Review score: 7.33/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: Watchlist
Verified claims: 20

Abstract

Abstract: In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family includes two new models: (1) an updated Gemini 1.5 Pro, which exceeds the February version on the great majority of capabilities and benchmarks; (2) Gemini 1.5 Flash, a more lightweight variant designed for efficiency with minimal regression in quality. Gemini 1.5 models achieve nea

Research Question

What is the robustness degradation of 7B and 70B LLMs on HotPotQA when context window is extended from 32K to 128K tokens under noisy retrieval conditions (e.g., 20% irrelevant passages), and does the accuracy drop per retrieval step differ between model sizes?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims20
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierWatchlist
BasisReview score or public verified-claim signal is below DOI-grade threshold.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength LOW
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status MEDIUM

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL3, Claim aggregate record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordNot registered
Claim lineage20 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.