Comparative Degradation of GNN-Based NIDS Under Adversarial Perturbations Across Datasets

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the comparative degradation in classification accuracy and robustness scores of GNN-based NIDS models under universal adversarial perturbations when trained on CIC-IDS2017 and evaluated on. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are critical components in safeguarding 5G/6G networks from both internal and external cyber threats. While traditional IDS approaches rely heavily on signature-based methods, they struggle to detect novel and evolving attacks. 13 claims were extracted from source literature; 4 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 4.8/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

What is the comparative degradation in classification accuracy and robustness scores of GNN-based NIDS models under universal adversarial perturbations when trained on CIC-IDS2017 and evaluated on UNSW-NB15?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance