Multilingual LLM Ranking Consistency Across Code and Knowledge Benchmarks at Scale

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the ranking consistency of multilingual LLMs on technical code generation benchmarks like HumanEval-Multi compare to their performance on general knowledge benchmarks as model scale increases. Abstract The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) has driven a transformative shift in artificial intelligence (AI), reshaping both research paradigms and practical applications. Distinguished from their predecessors by unprecedented scale and advanced capabilities. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 8 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 9.0/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

How does the ranking consistency of multilingual LLMs on technical code generation benchmarks like HumanEval-Multi compare to their performance on general knowledge benchmarks as model scale increases?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance