Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:8D41551D

On-Device vs. Cloud Deployment Trade-offs for SLMs and LLMs in CWE Detection for Private Python Codebases

Submitted: 30 May 2026
Review score: 7.83/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: DOI grade
Verified claims: 3

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the trade-off between inference throughput and pass@1 accuracy for SLMs vs. LLMs in CWE detection tasks on private Python codebases when deployed on-device vs. in cloud environments. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in understanding and analyzing code for security vulnerabilities, such as Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs). However, their reliance on cloud infrastructure and substantial computational requirements pose. 3 claims were extracted from source literature; 2 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.8/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

What is the trade-off between inference throughput and pass@1 accuracy for SLMs vs. LLMs in CWE detection tasks on private Python codebases when deployed on-device vs. in cloud environments?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims3
Claim record sourceparsed source sections

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierDOI grade
BasisReview score and verified-claim count meet DOI-grade public quality thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status MEDIUM

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL3, Claim aggregate record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordNot registered
Claim lineage3 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.