Index |  Research ▾  |  Verification ▾  | About
SRCH:8AB028A7

How does the accuracy of Tree of Reviews on MuSiQue at 128K context degrade when the number of distractor pass

Submitted: 29 May 2026
Review score: 8.00/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Gate status: Unverified
Quality tier: DOI grade
Verified claims: 6
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20437593

Abstract

Abstract: Long-context capability is considered one of the most important abilities of LLMs, as a truly long context-capable LLM shall enable its users to effortlessly process many originally exhausting tasks -e.g., digesting a long-form document to find answers v.s., directly asking an LLM about it.However, existing realtask-based long-context evaluation benchmarks have a few major shortcomings.For instance, some Needle-in-a-Haystack-like benchmarks are too synthetic, and therefore do not represent the real world usage of LLMs.While some real-task-based benchmarks like Long-Bench avoid this problem, su

Research Question

How does the accuracy of Tree of Reviews on MuSiQue at 128K context degrade when the number of distractor passages is increased from 5 to 20, relative to chain-based retrieval, using Llama-3-128K?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims6
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Truth-Engine Gate Verdict

StatusUnverified
GateGate 2 — Verification (formal proof or sandbox reproduction)
ReasonPublished before the Gate 2 verification pipeline was activated (2026-06-10). No formal proof or sandbox reproduction has been attempted for this record.
Evaluated2026-06-10T06:30:49+00:00

This record has not completed Gate 2 of the verification pipeline (a type-checked Lean4 proof for mathematical claims, or a sealed-sandbox reproduction for empirical claims). It is a literature synthesis only. VERIFIED requires an attached reproducible artifact (Lean4 proof source, or repro script and results) before this status can be set; it is not derived from review score or claim count.

Quality Tier

TierDOI grade
BasisReview score and verified-claim count meet DOI-grade public quality thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage6 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.