How does SMoES's cross-modal reasoning accuracy on Winoground compare to modality-agnostic MoE-VLMs when evalu

Abstract

Abstract: Current cross-modal retrieval systems are evaluated using R@K measure which does not leverage semantic relationships rather strictly follows the manually marked image text query pairs. Therefore, current systems do not generalize well for the unseen data in the wild. To handle this, we propose a new measure, SemanticMap, to evaluate the performance of cross-modal systems. Our proposed measure evaluates the semantic similarity between the image and text representations in the latent embedding space. We also propose a novel cross-modal retrieval system using a single stream network for bidirecti

Research Question

How does SMoES's cross-modal reasoning accuracy on Winoground compare to modality-agnostic MoE-VLMs when evaluated on the hardest subset of examples (those with low unimodal bias)?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Truth-Engine Gate Verdict

This record has not completed Gate 2 of the verification pipeline (a type-checked Lean4 proof for mathematical claims, or a sealed-sandbox reproduction for empirical claims). It is a literature synthesis only. VERIFIED requires an attached reproducible artifact (Lean4 proof source, or repro script and results) before this status can be set; it is not derived from review score or claim count.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance