Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:4787136D

Does increasing VLA parameter count from 7B to 13B improve long-horizon task completion rate and average rewar

Submitted: 29 May 2026
Review score: 8.67/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: Flagship candidate
Verified claims: 8
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20439548

Abstract

Abstract: Incremental decision making in real-world environments is one of the most challenging tasks in embodied artificial intelligence. One particularly demanding scenario is Vision and Language Navigation (VLN) which requires visual and natural language understanding as well as spatial and temporal reasoning capabilities. The embodied agent needs to ground its understanding of navigation instructions in observations of a real-world environment like Street View. Despite the impressive results of LLMs in other research areas, it is an ongoing problem of how to best connect them with an interactive vis

Research Question

Does increasing VLA parameter count from 7B to 13B improve long-horizon task completion rate and average reward on R2R-CE when evaluated with zero-shot cross-dataset generalization?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims8
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierFlagship candidate
BasisReview score, verified-claim count, and public artifact coverage meet flagship-candidate thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage8 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.