Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:46DDCC86

Can SMoES-trained modality routing generalize to other multimodal benchmarks (e.g., DocVQA, InfographicVQA) un

Submitted: 27 May 2026
Review score: 7.50/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: DOI grade
Verified claims: 8
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20419205

Abstract

Abstract: Accurate morphological classification of white blood cells (WBCs) is an important step in the diagnosis of leukemia, a disease in which nonfunctional blast cells accumulate in the bone marrow. Recently, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been successfully used to classify leukocytes by training them on single-cell images from a specific domain. Most CNN models assume that the distributions of the training and test data are similar, i.e., the data are independently and identically distributed. Therefore, they are not robust to different staining procedures, magnifications, resolutio

Research Question

Can SMoES-trained modality routing generalize to other multimodal benchmarks (e.g., DocVQA, InfographicVQA) under domain shift, and how do accuracy and latency trade-offs differ from chart-specific distribution shifts?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims8
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierDOI grade
BasisReview score and verified-claim count meet DOI-grade public quality thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage8 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.