Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:3F6DB47C

Qwen2.5-72B Performance on HumanEval-V Versus Standard Code Generation Benchmarks

Submitted: 30 May 2026
Review score: 8.33/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: DOI grade
Verified claims: 4

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the performance of Qwen2.5-72B on HumanEval-V compare to its performance on standard code generation benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP. In this work, we present Qwen3, the latest version of the Qwen model family. Qwen3 comprises a series of large language models (LLMs) designed to advance performance, efficiency, and multilingual capabilities. 4 claims were extracted from source literature; 4 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.3/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

How does the performance of Qwen2.5-72B on HumanEval-V compare to its performance on standard code generation benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims4
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierDOI grade
BasisReview score and verified-claim count meet DOI-grade public quality thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status MEDIUM

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL3, Claim aggregate record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordNot registered
Claim lineage4 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.