Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:2C77EB05

Cross-Domain Performance of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA in Recommendation Systems

Submitted: 2 June 2026
Review score: 7.73/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: DOI grade
Verified claims: 8
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20501934

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the performance of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA vary when applied to cross-domain recommendation tasks, such as transferring from MovieLens-100K to Amazon Book Reviews, in terms of precision@10. In recent years, recommendation systems have become essential for businesses to enhance customer satisfaction and generate revenue in various domains, such as e-commerce and entertainment. Deep learning techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of these. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 8 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.7/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

How does the performance of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA vary when applied to cross-domain recommendation tasks, such as transferring from MovieLens-100K to Amazon Book Reviews, in terms of precision@10 and recall@20?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims8
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierDOI grade
BasisReview score and verified-claim count meet DOI-grade public quality thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage8 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.