SRCH:21ED3726
Scaling Model Parameters and Solution Propagation in HumanEval Pro Benchmark
Abstract
Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: To what extent does increasing model parameter count improve the success rate of propagating correct solutions from base to complex problems in the HumanEval Pro benchmark. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 4.8/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.
Research Question
To what extent does increasing model parameter count improve the success rate of propagating correct solutions from base to complex problems in the HumanEval Pro benchmark?
Verification Level
| Paper level | L1, Literature synthesis | |
| Source-grounded claims | 0 | |
| Claim record source | not publicly specified |
Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.
Quality Tier
| Tier | Quarantine candidate | |
| Basis | Review score is below 5.0; source-level inspection is required before relying on the synthesis. |
Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.
Quality Dimensions
| Evidence strength | LOW | |
| Uncertainty disclosure | MEDIUM | |
| Reproducibility status | MEDIUM |
Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.
Correction Record
| Status | CURRENT |
| Correction count | 0 |
| Manifest contract | paper-manifest-v1.1 |
| Correction contract | correction-record-v1 |
Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.
Provenance
| Publisher | Assignee Research |
| Public provenance | L2, Public artifact record |
| Report artifact | Available |
| External record | Not registered |
| Claim lineage | 0 aggregate source-grounded claims |
| Review method | Automated multi-reviewer assessment |
| Quality guide | How to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links |
| Provenance contract | source-provenance-v1 |
| Note | Machine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research. |