Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:1FF2C94E

Can a lightweight, severity-aware adversarial detection filter (e.g., based on embedding cosine distance) impr

Submitted: 28 May 2026
Review score: 8.67/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: Flagship candidate
Verified claims: 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20428876

Abstract

Abstract: State-of-the-art object detection networks depend on region proposal algorithms to hypothesize object locations. Advances like SPPnet [1] and Fast R-CNN [2] have reduced the running time of these detection networks, exposing region proposal computation as a bottleneck. In this work, we introduce a Region Proposal Network (RPN) that shares full-image convolutional features with the detection network, thus enabling nearly cost-free region proposals. An RPN is a fully convolutional network that simultaneously predicts object bounds and objectness scores at each position. The RPN is trained end-to

Research Question

Can a lightweight, severity-aware adversarial detection filter (e.g., based on embedding cosine distance) improve inference throughput by selectively skipping retrieval or generation steps in RAG pipelines, and what is the throughput-accuracy trade-off on MultiHopQA under adversarial perturbations?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims5
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierFlagship candidate
BasisReview score, verified-claim count, and public artifact coverage meet flagship-candidate thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage5 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.