Comparative Analysis of Training Throughput and Inference Latency in PyCaret Ensembles versus BiLSTM with Attention for

Abstract

Abstract: Sentiment analysis of product reviews on e-commerce platforms plays a critical role in automatically understanding customer satisfaction and providing actionable insights for sellers seeking to improve product quality. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study comparing a Machine Learning (ML) approach via the PyCaret AutoML framework against a Deep Learning (DL) approach based on a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) architecture with an Attention mechanism for binary sentiment classification on Indonesian product reviews. The dataset comprises 19,728 samples balanced e

Research Question

How do training throughput and inference latency compare between PyCaret-optimized ensemble models and BiLSTM with attention for binary sentiment classification in resource-constrained environments?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Truth-Engine Gate Verdict

This record has not completed Gate 2 of the verification pipeline (a type-checked Lean4 proof for mathematical claims, or a sealed-sandbox reproduction for empirical claims). It is a literature synthesis only. VERIFIED requires an attached reproducible artifact (Lean4 proof source, or repro script and results) before this status can be set; it is not derived from review score or claim count.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance