Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
SRCH:0DC33C25

Modality-Native Routing in Agent-to-Agent Networks: A Multimodal A2A Protocol Ex

Submitted: 27 May 2026
Review score: 8.50/10
Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims
Quality tier: Flagship candidate
Verified claims: 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20418206

Abstract

Abstract: Preserving multimodal signals across agent boundaries is necessary for accurate cross-modal reasoning, but it is not sufficient. We show that modality-native routing in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) networks improves task accuracy by 20 percentage points over text-bottleneck baselines, but only when the downstream reasoning agent can exploit the richer context that native routing preserves. An ablation replacing LLM-backed reasoning with keyword matching eliminates the accuracy gap entirely (36\% vs. 36\%), establishing a two-layer requirement: protocol-level routing must be paired with capable agent-lev

Research Question

Can SMoES-trained modality routing generalize to other multimodal benchmarks (e.g., DocVQA, InfographicVQA) under domain shift, and how do accuracy and latency trade-offs differ from chart-specific distribution shifts?

Verification Level

Paper levelL2, Source-grounded claims
Source-grounded claims5
Claim record sourcenot publicly specified

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

TierFlagship candidate
BasisReview score, verified-claim count, and public artifact coverage meet flagship-candidate thresholds.

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Evidence strength MEDIUM
Citation grounding MEDIUM
Uncertainty disclosure MEDIUM
Reproducibility status HIGH

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

StatusCURRENT
Correction count0
Manifest contractpaper-manifest-v1.1
Correction contractcorrection-record-v1

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance

PublisherAssignee Research
Public provenanceL4, External archival record
Report artifactAvailable
External recordRegistered
Claim lineage5 aggregate source-grounded claims
Review methodAutomated multi-reviewer assessment
Quality guideHow to read scores, claims, manifests, and evidence links
Provenance contractsource-provenance-v1
NoteMachine-generated synthesis of existing literature. Not primary research.