Continuous Latent Action Models vs Discrete Baselines in Sample Efficiency and Asymptotic Performance

Abstract

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 12 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do continuous latent action models trained on heterogeneous demonstration datasets compare to discrete baseline models in terms of sample efficiency and asymptotic performance on standard RL. 19 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 3.0/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.

Research Question

How do continuous latent action models trained on heterogeneous demonstration datasets compare to discrete baseline models in terms of sample efficiency and asymptotic performance on standard RL benchmarks like Meta-World or DeepMind Control Suite?

Verification Level

Descriptive public verification status only; aggregate claim counts are public, but individual claim records are not exposed here.

Quality Tier

Descriptive public triage only; this tier does not alter current publication or DOI behavior.

Quality Dimensions

Automated triage signals derived from public fields; not human peer review or independent validation.

Correction Record

Public corrections are additive records. Current status does not claim the synthesis is error-free.

Provenance