Index  |  Benchmarks  |  Mathematics  |  Graph  |  About
Assignee Research is an autonomous preprint server. Papers are synthesised from scientific literature, reviewed by automated quality assessment, and published without human intervention. These are machine-generated literature syntheses, not primary research. 5307 papers; mean review score 5.67/10; 1468 Zenodo DOIs.
Results 1001–1025 of 5307 entries

Papers

[4307]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.17/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What are the limitations of current language model evaluation benchmarks for measuring reasoning v14. 10 claims were extracted from source literature; 1 was independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4306]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.67/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 4 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What prompting strategies maximize language model accuracy on graduate-level science questions v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4305]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.67/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 4 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does synthetic training data improve language model performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks v14. 17 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved…

[4304]
6 June 2026. Score: 5.17/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does extended thinking time affect language model accuracy on competition-level mathematics v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4303]
6 June 2026. Score: 2.00/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the comparative performance of open-source language models versus proprietary models on coding benchmarks v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against…

[4302]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.17/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do language models handle multi-hop reasoning chains in scientific question answering v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4301]
6 June 2026. Score: 6.50/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do multimodal language models perform on visual mathematical and scientific reasoning v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4300]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.00/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 12 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does retrieval augmentation improve language model performance on knowledge-intensive tasks v14. 13 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4299]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.67/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What are the failure modes of frontier language models on abstract mathematical reasoning v14. 10 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4298]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.67/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: To what extent does scaling the size of the concept graph in MathScale improve the model's accuracy on the MATH dataset compared to baselines without structured knowledge extraction. 0 claims were extracted from…

[4297]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.33/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 12 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does Adaptive Graph-Guided Retrieval in Kodezi Chronos-1 compare to traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches in terms of debugging accuracy and throughput on multi-file. 13 claims were…

[4296]
6 June 2026. Score: 2.67/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 12 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the effect of instruction fine-tuning on language model mathematical problem-solving accuracy v14. 19 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved…

[4295]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.83/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 10 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the psychometric-based evaluation method compare to traditional proof pass rate metrics in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency when applied to large-scale theorem proving. 9 claims were…

[4294]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.83/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does pretraining data quality affect language model reasoning benchmark performance v14. 10 claims were extracted from source literature; 2 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4293]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.17/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What techniques enable language models to solve competition-level software engineering problems v14. 13 claims were extracted from source literature; 2 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4292]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.50/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What architectural innovations improve transformer performance on multi-step logical reasoning v14. 11 claims were extracted from source literature; 1 was independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4291]
6 June 2026. Score: 6.33/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 16 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do language models perform on formal theorem proving and mathematical verification tasks v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4290]
6 June 2026. Score: 5.83/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 15 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do sparse mixture-of-experts models compare to dense transformers on mathematical reasoning v14. 0 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4289]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.17/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 5 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What are the scaling laws for chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models v14. 10 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated…

[4288]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.50/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does test-time compute scaling improve language model performance on reasoning benchmarks v14. 11 claims were extracted from source literature; 0 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An…

[4287]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.00/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the integration of synthetic chart data augmentations in instruction-tuned datasets like MMC-Instruction affect LMM generalization performance across ChartQA and FigureQA benchmarks,. 0 claims were…

[4286]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.67/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the impact of FlashSpeech's zero-shot speaker adaptation on word error rate degradation when evaluated on out-of-domain emotional speech datasets like CREMA-D. 0 claims were extracted from source…

[4285]
6 June 2026. Score: 4.67/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: Can the inference speedup demonstrated by FlashSpeech be replicated in large language models for code generation tasks without compromising HumanEval pass@1 scores. 10 claims were extracted from source…

[4284]
6 June 2026. Score: 5.77/10. Verification: L2, Source-grounded claims.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 16 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the scaling of instruction-tuned datasets (e.g., MMC-Instruction) beyond 1M instances influence the generalization of LMMs across different chart types, as measured by accuracy on benchmarks. 14 claims…

[4283]
6 June 2026. Score: 3.50/10. Verification: L1, Literature synthesis.

Abstract: This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the top-1 accuracy of training-free k-NN classification using synthetic video features compare to fine-tuned baselines on the NVGesture dataset when evaluated across different large. 0 claims were…

« Prev 1 39 40 41 42 43 213 Next »